VHT, Inc. v. Zillow Group, Inc., No. 2:2015-cv-01096 (W.D. Wash. 2017)
By: Pranav Katti & Nancy Wolff
The Ninth Circuit recently addressed a number of outstanding copyright issues between Zillow, the popular apartment hunting website, and VHT a provider of real estate photographersâ photos, and VHT, although it left the question of whether database registrations offer statutory damages for each image, or if all the images in one application are limited to one award of statutory damages. Although Zillow properly licensed these photos from VHT, the central question was whether Zillow exceeded the scope of this license, and the calculation of damages.
The Zillow Platform: Zillow is a user-oriented site where users can search for certain photos and even save and upload images to a private âpersonal boardâ. The photos on Zillow fall within the categories of âdisplayedâ, ânot displayedâ, âsearchableâ and ânot searchableâ. Zillow used VHT photos in two areas on its website, a âlisting platformâ and âdigsâ. The listing platform features photos and information about properties while digs features photos of rooms within some of those properties, artfully and aesthetically designed to facilitate home improvement and remodeling.
District Court Decision: The district court previously found that Zillow did not directly infringe the 54,257 listing platform photos, the 22,109 non-displayed photos and the 2,093 displayed but non-searchable digs photos. Zillow also escaped the claim of secondary copyright liability for the use of the photos on digs. However, Zillowâs was found to have directly infringed 3,921 displayed and searchable VHT photos on digs and the court rejected its fair use argument. The court also found that Zillow willfully infringed on 3,373 searchable photos and in assessing damages, asked the jury, which photographs allegedly infringed upon, had an independent economic value.
Ninth Circuit: Â On appeal, the Ninth Circuit similarly found that Zillow did not directly infringe upon the copyrights of the 54,257 photos used on their listing platform and the 22,109 non-displayed photos and 2,093 displayed but non-searchable photos.. The reasoning behind this decision lays primarily in the type of agreements that VHT provided Zillow, the control Zillow had over these photos and Zillow designing its system to avoid copyright infringement as much as possible. Also aiding Zillow was their prompt action to address claims of infringement and VHTâs lackluster effort in providing Zillow the information needed to adequately address these claims.
Zillowâs System: VHT provided Zillow with either âevergreenâ or âdeciduousâ rights in the photos provided. Evergreen rights allow a photo to be used without any time restriction, or in other words, a photo can remain on the site even after the property has been sold. Conversely, a deciduous right is time-limited. Zillow required VHT to designate the type of agreement underlying each provided photo, and Zillowâs system then automatically sorted the photos pursuant to these agreements and automatically treated each photo within the scope of its agreement. Zillow designed an automated âtrumpingâ algorithm to determine which photos to display on the listing platform. This system gave preference to photos with evergreen rights in order to design a system avoiding copyright infringement. Because VHT provided the agreement designation for each provided photo, Zillow also did not exert control over these photos.
Direct liability: Zillow avoided direct liability on the 2,093 digs photos that users copied to their personal boards but were not added to Zillowâs searchable database, based on the immunity granted qualified ISPâs under the Copyright Act for user generated content.Â Photos designated by Zillow as searchable requires a moderator to designate the photo for tagging. The mere possibility that Zillow had the opportunity to moderate and tag these photos was not sufficient to transform Zillow from a passive host to an active one.
Fair Use: In response to the 3,921 searchable photos which Zillow moderators personally tagged, Zillow contends that digsâ searchable function amounts to fair use as the use was âtransformativeâ. The past two decades has been wrought with cases involving the transformative nature of search engines. Important to the determination is whether the use serves the same function as the original use, whether the entirety of the work is used and whether the new use promotes the purposes of copyright. Merely to use the label of âsearch engineâ is not dispositive and the court must assess each case holistically.
The Ninth Circuit disagreed that Zillowâs use was transformative. First, Zillowâs use of VHTâs photos did not change their original purpose, to use the photos to artfully depict rooms within real estate properties. Digs also uses the entirety of the image and Zillow supersedes VHTâs purpose in creating the images in the first place. A copying of full works may be justified if it allows consumers to recognize the image and decide whether to search for more information, such as Googleâs Google Books project in which snippets of books were provided in a searchable database, which would otherwise take an exorbitant amount of time to find. As the Second Circuit stated, if Google Books âtests the boundaries of fair useâ, then Zillow certainly exceeds it.
Secondary Liability The Ninth Circuit found in favor of Zillow on secondary liability based on a âsimple measuresâ standard of the DMCA and the inability of Zillow to police its users. A computer operator is liable for contributory liability if they can take simple measures to prevent further copyright infringement, yet the operator continue providing access to those works. Here, in order to take down large numbers of photos, Zillow required a Zillow image ID contained in the URL of the image location. Zillow posts multiple copies of its images throughout its site, so simply identifying the image does not allow them to easily find the sources of infringement. It was VHTâs burden to provide these URLâs. Additionally, VHTâs argument that Zillow had the ability to employ watermark detection technology is unavailing, because VHT rarely watermarked their photos. Zillow also lacked the practical ability to police its users infringing content. As the Ninth Circuit stated, âOnce â¦ photos were uploaded to the listing platform â¦ ferreting out claimed infringement through use on digs was beyond hunting for a needle in a haystack.â VHT failed to provide URLâs to specific sources of infringement and did not employ watermarking technology. These factors combined with Zillowâs inability to police its usersâ activity weighed in Zillowâs favor.
Damages: The Ninth Circuit took issue with the District Courtâs determination of damages and remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the VHT photos used on digs were part of a compilation or if they are individual photos for purpose of statutory damages. A compilation is entitled to a single award of statutory damages and VHT was seeking damages for each individual photo, which Zillow used.
DMLA joined other photography associations and filed an amicus brief supporting VHTâs position that a determination that all the photos in a group database registration were a compilation would threaten photographersâ ability to enforce their copyrights. DMLA noted that the purpose of group registration under the Copyright Act was to alleviate the financial and administrative burdens of registering large numbers of works. Precluding individual protection of works within a group registration would discourage artists from seeking protection (a status required to file a copyright suit) if registration of a group work could obliterate any protection in infringements of individual works within that group work.
Takeaway: The Ninth Circuitâs decision highlights the protections the DMCA offers internet companies. The court looked at Zillowâs proactive measures in preventing liability, namely by ensuring that VHT controlled their photos as much as possible, setting up automated trumping systems to sort through photos, and being very proactive in response to VHTâs claims of infringement. However, the court did not require additional measures, such as watermarking. It also highlights how difficult the DMCA is on content creators, especially where many images are infringed. It was VHT burden to identify each Zillow URL and not provide merely provide copies of the images to Zillow. On April 8, 2019 the Copyright Office is holding a roundtable on the section of the DMCA relating to the notice required to be given to ISPâs by content holders, and ISPâs responses and the burdens on the parties.Â A representative of DMLA will be attending.